Evaboot vs Hunter.io 2026: Which Wins on Cost Per Lead

Evaboot costs $9/month for 100 credits and only works inside LinkedIn Sales Navigator, pulling and verifying emails from leads you've already found there. Hunter.io starts at $49/month ($34/month billed yearly) for 2,000 credits and works on any domain, no Sales Navigator required. If your pipeline lives entirely in Sales Navigator searches, Evaboot is cheaper per verified lead. If it doesn't, Hunter.io is the one that actually works for you.

Evaboot vs Hunter.io: Pricing, Accuracy, and Features Compared

Axis	Evaboot	Hunter.io	Edge
Starting price	$9/mo, 100 credits	$49/mo, 2,000 credits ($34/mo yearly)	Evaboot
Accuracy	Valid / Catch-all / Bounce tags, no % published	Finder-plus-verifier, no % published	Tie
Additional features	Sales Nav data cleaning, lead filtering	Email sequences, AI writer, 25,000 recipients/sequence on Scale	Hunter for outreach, Evaboot for hygiene
Integrations	Zapier, n8n, Clay, HubSpot, API	HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Zoho, Zapier, Clay, Snowflake	Hunter.io
Best-fit team size	Solo founders, small SDR teams on Sales Nav	3+ seats needing finding plus sending	Depends on workflow

How much does Evaboot cost vs Hunter.io in 2026?

Evaboot's cheapest tier is $9/month for 100 credits, where 1 credit equals one lead exported and a verified email costs roughly 2 credits, per Evaboot's pricing page. Hunter.io runs Free ($0, 50 credits), Starter ($49/month or $34/month yearly, 2,000 credits), Growth ($149/month or $104/month yearly, 10,000 credits), and Scale ($299/month or $209/month yearly, 25,000 credits), per Hunter's pricing page.

The catch: Evaboot's credits only spend against Sales Navigator leads you export, not a raw domain list. Hunter's credits work on any company or domain, which is why its floor price runs 5x higher. You're pricing a Sales Nav companion against a general-purpose finder, not the same product twice.

Which tool finds more accurate emails, Evaboot or Hunter.io?

Neither publishes a blanket accuracy percentage, so ignore any post that quotes one. Both use a finder-plus-verifier model and bucket results into confidence tiers instead of a single number, per each tool's own site.

Evaboot labels results Valid, Catch-all, or Bounce. Hunter.io charges 0.5 credit to verify an email it already found. Your real accuracy depends on how hard you filter out Catch-all and unverified rows before upload, not which vendor's logo sits on the export button.

What extra features and integrations does each tool offer?

Evaboot is a Chrome extension, full stop. It cleans Sales Navigator exports (strips legal suffixes, fixes capitalization, removes emojis), filters leads against your search criteria, and pushes lists to Zapier, n8n, Clay, or HubSpot, per Evaboot's site.

Hunter.io is a broader platform: paid plans add email sequences, an AI writing assistant, and up to 25,000 recipients per sequence on Scale. Its integration list runs deeper too, HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Zoho CRM, Snowflake, and Clay, per Hunter's integrations page. If you already send through Smartlead or Instantly, that sequencing is redundant weight.

Evaboot vs Hunter.io: which should you use in 2026?

If you're a founder or small SDR team already living inside Sales Navigator, Evaboot is the cheaper way to turn searches into a clean list. Don't buy Hunter's $49/month Starter plan to do what a $9 extension already handles.

But if prospecting starts from a domain list, an ICP spreadsheet, or Clay rather than a Sales Navigator search, Evaboot is useless to you. Hunter.io is the one that works when your source isn't LinkedIn, and that flexibility earns agencies the higher floor price. Modern Inbound has booked 3,000+ qualified B2B meetings on mixed-source pipelines, and the finder that matches your source data wins over the one with the lowest sticker price.

Frequently asked questions

Is Evaboot cheaper than Hunter.io?

Yes, on entry price. Evaboot starts at $9/month for 100 credits versus Hunter.io's $49/month for 2,000 credits ($34/month yearly), per each tool's pricing page. But Evaboot only works on Sales Navigator exports, so the comparison only holds if that's your source.

Can Hunter.io replace Evaboot for LinkedIn Sales Navigator exports?

No. Hunter.io finds and verifies emails by domain or company but doesn't export or clean Sales Navigator search results the way Evaboot does. If Sales Navigator is your primary source, Evaboot's cleaning layer has no direct equivalent in Hunter.io.

Does Evaboot or Hunter.io have better email verification?

Neither publishes a blanket accuracy percentage. Both use finder-plus-verifier models and bucket results into confidence tiers, so verification quality depends on how strictly you filter results, not the vendor.

Which tool is better for a small agency running multiple client campaigns?

Hunter.io generally fits agencies better since it isn't tied to Sales Navigator, and its Growth and Scale plans support more seats plus integrations like Salesforce and Zoho CRM. Evaboot works well as a cheaper add-on for the Sales Navigator portion of sourcing.

By Rishabh Ambasta, Founder, Modern Inbound.

Neither tool books meetings on its own, they just find addresses. If you'd rather have a team handle sourcing, verification, and the whole outbound engine end to end, see how Modern Inbound's setup plan works.